57 seats, multiple caucuses, and simultaneous agendas.
Many files, limited technical time.
Advisory teams must turn long documents into usable guidance for committees, caucuses, or plenary sessions without losing legal precision.
Legislative intelligence for Costa Rica
Review legislative files before they move forward.
Sirius-Lex identifies constitutional risks, citation errors, conflicts with current legislation, and regulatory impact, with findings traceable to official sources.
Consulting service for legislative advisory teams, caucuses, law firms, and regulatory teams.
The bottleneck is not political. It is technical.
Legislative decisions are made under tight timelines, long files, and public scrutiny. Risk appears when the technical team does not have enough time to verify every citation, every article, and every effect on the current legal framework.
The Rules of Procedure of the Legislative Assembly require bills to be submitted in open digital format.
The file is digital. The review is still fragmented.
Having a digital text does not solve citation review, constitutional analysis, affected laws, or institutional impact.
In File 23.771, Sirius-Lex detected a constitutional citation attributed to the wrong article.
A citation error can change the analysis.
A misattributed reference weakens the bill's legal foundation and exposes the office to late corrections.
Deliverables
What the client receives
Each analysis is delivered as a consulting product: prioritized findings, verifiable evidence, and review recommendations so the technical team can decide what to correct, defend, or escalate.
01
Constitutional and legal audit
Article-by-article review of the file to identify constitutional risks, tensions with legal principles, and issues of normative coherence.
02
Legal citation verification
Review of legal references against current Costa Rican legislation, flagging correct, incomplete, ambiguous, or misattributed citations.
03
Regulatory impact map
Identification of laws, institutional powers, and secondary effects that may be affected by the file.
04
Comparative and conflict analysis
Cross-analysis to compare related legislative files and detect duplication, contradictions, gaps, or conflicts with current legislation.
05
Traceable executive report
Exportable document with summary, findings, risk status, sources, observations, and recommended points for human review.
Verified real case
File 23.771, Artificial Intelligence Bill
File 23.771
Sirius-Lex analyzed File 23.771 as a demonstrative case of preventive legislative quality control. The analysis reviewed the bill against current Costa Rican legislation, verified legal citations, and classified findings by risk level.
Misattributed constitutional citation
The file linked Article 9 of the Constitution to access to justice. Verification found that the article regulates separation of powers, so the legal foundation required correction.
Incomplete institutional design
The creation of a specialized authority was proposed without sufficient clarity on its legal nature, governance structure, funding sources, and relationship with the Executive Branch.
Insufficient sanctions framework
The bill announced sanctions without sufficiently defining conducts, ranges, and conditions of application, creating a relevant legal risk.
The report includes an executive summary, risk status, verified citations, article-level observations, and regulatory impacts. Findings do not replace human legal judgment; they guide technical review, discussion, and correction.
Service
How the service works
Sirius-Lex is engaged per analysis or consulting assignment. The starting point is not a software account: it is a file, a legislative question, or a regulatory decision that requires technical review.
01
Define the file
The client identifies the file, base text, or set of bills to review, together with the main technical question and intended use.
02
Run the analysis
Sirius-Lex reviews citations, risks, normative conflicts, and impact. Findings are structured with source, article, risk level, and explanation.
03
Deliver and discuss findings
An executive report is delivered and critical points are reviewed with the client's team to prioritize corrections, questions, or decisions.
Timeline
An initial review can be organized within 24-48 hours, depending on scope, text availability, and file complexity. Extensive or comparative analyses are scheduled by scope.
What the report includes
Executive summary, risk status, verified citations, article-level observations, regulatory impact map, detected conflicts, review recommendations, and limitations note.
Differentiation
Not a general legal AI
Sirius-Lex does not compete to answer any legal question. Its focus is reviewing specific legislative files and turning them into verifiable findings for teams preparing technical guidance.
| Comparison | What it solves | Typical limit | How Sirius-Lex is different |
|---|---|---|---|
| SOFIA / Tirant | Research, conversation, drafting, and general legal analysis. | Not focused on the parliamentary workflow of a specific file. | Sirius-Lex organizes the analysis around the file, its articles, citations, risks, and legislative impacts. |
| SOFIA / Tirant What it solves Research, conversation, drafting, and general legal analysis. Typical limit Not focused on the parliamentary workflow of a specific file. How Sirius-Lex is different Sirius-Lex organizes the analysis around the file, its articles, citations, risks, and legislative impacts. | |||
| Non-specialized generative AI | Fast synthesis and exploratory support. | May answer without enough traceability or without verifying current law. | Sirius-Lex requires sources, identifies specific articles, and separates verifiable findings from observations. |
| Non-specialized generative AI What it solves Fast synthesis and exploratory support. Typical limit May answer without enough traceability or without verifying current law. How Sirius-Lex is different Sirius-Lex requires sources, identifies specific articles, and separates verifiable findings from observations. | |||
| Manual review | Expert judgment and political-institutional context. | Takes time and may miss cross-conflicts under pressure. | Sirius-Lex accelerates detection and organizes evidence so the human team can review better. |
| Manual review What it solves Expert judgment and political-institutional context. Typical limit Takes time and may miss cross-conflicts under pressure. How Sirius-Lex is different Sirius-Lex accelerates detection and organizes evidence so the human team can review better. | |||
The difference is not replacing legal judgment. It is giving the technical team a more structured, traceable, and timely review before the file moves forward.
Audience
Built for teams that prepare legislative guidance
Sirius-Lex is designed for teams that need to read, compare, explain, or challenge legislative files with speed and rigor.
01
Legislative advisors and chiefs of staff
Pain
They must summarize long files, anticipate objections, and avoid technical errors before meetings, committee sessions, or plenary debate.
02
Political caucuses and technical coordinators
Pain
They need consistent guidance across multiple files, with a common view of risks, citations, and decision points.
03
Law firms and regulatory teams
Pain
They must explain to clients or internal teams how a bill may affect obligations, institutional powers, or sector-specific risks.
04
Consulting firms and cooperation organizations
Pain
They require traceable legislative diagnostics for modernization, digital government, responsible AI, or institutional strengthening projects.
Sources and traceability
Verifiable sources. Human review. Clear limits.
Sirius-Lex works with current Costa Rican legislation and structures each finding so it can be reviewed against an identifiable source. The result is a technical basis for decision-making, not an official legal opinion.
Traceability by finding
Each relevant observation is linked to a rule, article, source, and explanation of why it matters for the file.
Quality gate
The analysis applies exit criteria: zero invented citations, complete traceability, and human review before the report is used as an external input.
Auditable base
Sirius-Lex relies on an auditable technology base. SiriusOS provides transparency for the engine; legislative specialization and consulting judgment are delivered as a professional service.
Sirius-Lex findings are not an official legal opinion and do not replace human legal review.
Contact
Let us discuss your file
If your team needs to review a bill, compare legislative files, or prepare technical guidance on a legislative initiative, send the context and we will coordinate a conversation.